Key result
NOACs resulted in a shorter waiting time to cardioversion compared to warfarin (80% vs 67% within 25 days; P<0.001) and similar rates of thromboembolism (0.15% vs 0.14%; RR 1.07).
Why the study?
Do NOACs reduce waiting time to cardioversion and maintain safety in patients with non-valvular AF >48h compared to warfarin?
Observational (n=2,150)
Do NOACs reduce waiting time to cardioversion and maintain safety in patients with non-valvular AF >48h compared to warfarin?
Effect estimate: RR 1.07 (95% CI 0.10-11.81)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.15% vs 0.14%
In a real-world setting, NOACs significantly reduce the waiting time to cardioversion compared to warfarin, with similarly low rates of thromboembolism and major bleeding.
NOACs were associated with shorter cardioversion waits and similar thromboembolism risk; leaves open whether randomized trials confirm benefit or should change practice.
Aims: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly used as thromboembolic prophylaxis in cardioversion. We examined the waiting time to cardioversion and the outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) of > 48 h of duration who were treated with either NOACs or warfarin. Methods and results: Anticoagulation was handled in a structured, multidisciplinary AF-clinic. The objectives were the waiting time to cardioversion, and thromboembolism and major bleeding events within 60 days. In total, 2150 electrical cardioversions were performed; 684 (31.8%) of patients were on NOACs and 1466 (68.2%) were on warfarin. The waiting time to non-TOE-guided cardioversion was significantly shorter in the NOAC group compared with the warfarin group for all cardioversions (P < 0.001 for log-rank test) and for first-time cardioversions (P < 0.001 for log-rank test). For all non-TOE-guided cardioversions, 80% of procedures on NOACs and 67% of procedures on warfarin were performed within 25 days (P < 0.001). Thromboembolism occurred in one patient (0.15%) receiving NOAC and in two patients (0.14%) receiving warfarin (risk ratio (RR) 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10-11.81). Major bleeding events occurred in four patients (0.58%) in the NOAC group and 11 patients (0.75%) in the warfarin group (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.25-2.43). Conclusion: In a real-world clinical setting with anticoagulation handled in a structured multidisciplinary AF clinic, the waiting time to cardioversion was shorter with NOACs compared to warfarin. The rates of thromboembolism and major bleeding events were low, with NOACs shown to be as effective and safe as warfarin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frederiksen et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation of > 48 h duration (n=2,150). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Thromboembolism within 60 days (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.10-11.81). NOACs resulted in a shorter waiting time to cardioversion compared to warfarin (80% vs 67% within 25 days; P<0.001) and similar rates of thromboembolism (0.15% vs 0.14%; RR 1.07).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: