Key result
Younger physicians and cardiologists are more likely to prescribe short-term OAC after low-risk AF cardioversion.
Why the study?
International guidelines differ on short-term oral anticoagulation after acute cardioversion for recent-onset atrial fibrillation in low-risk patients, with no strong evidence supporting its indication.
Cross-Sectional (n=78)
Yes
p-value: p=0.049 and 0.029
Real-world antithrombotic management of low-risk, acutely cardioverted AF patients varies significantly among different healthcare systems and physician specialties, reflecting conflicting international guidelines.
Physician age and specialty drive post-cardioversion OAC variation in low-risk AF; leaves open optimal strategy and outcome impact amid guideline conflicts.
Background and Objectives: International guidelines differ on short-term (4-week) oral anticoagulation (OAC) indication after acute cardioversion for recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF < 12–48 h) in low-risk patients (CHA2DS2-VA = 0). While Canadian and Chinese guidelines recommend OAC for all, European, Australian and New Zealand, and American guidelines state that such treatment is optional due to the absence of high-quality evidence supporting its indication in this specific scenario. This study aimed to assess physicians’ management of a simple clinical case at an international level, focusing on how they balance ischemic and bleeding risks in a setting lacking any strong evidence-based recommendations. Materials and Methods: Six different AF guidelines were evaluated regarding the recommendation for and scientific evidence justifying short-term OAC in this specific setting. Following review, an international questionnaire was developed with Google Forms 2024 (Mountain View, CA, USA) and circulated among physicians working in the fields of cardiology, internal medicine, intensive care unit, geriatrics, and emergency medicine at 17 centres in Italy, France, and Canada. Results: A total of 78 responses were obtained. Younger physicians and cardiologists appeared to administer OAC more frequently compared to older physicians or those working in other specialties (95% CI Fisher’s Exact Test p = 0.049 and 0.029, respectively). Significant differences were observed in the use of periprocedural imaging, with transoesophageal echocardiogram (TOE) prior to cardioversion being performed more often in Europe vs. Canada (p = 0.006) and in long-term rhythm control, with first-line pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) being offered more frequently by European cardiologists (p = 0.013). No statistically significant association was found regarding guideline adherence for OAC administration (p = 0.120). Conclusions: The real-world antithrombotic management of low-risk (CHA2DS2-VA = 0), acutely cardioverted AF patients varies significantly among different healthcare systems. Particularly in cardiology departments, reducing the time limit for safely not prescribing OAC to < 12 h, ensuring local access to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and considering regional stroke risk profiles, as well as actively preventing haemorrhage in patients receiving short-term OAC could all limit cardioversion-related complications in this low-risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sullivan et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial Fibrillation (n=78). Physician specialty and years of experience vs. Other specialties and older physicians was evaluated on Propensity to prescribe short-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) after acute cardioversion in low-risk AF patients (p=0.049 and 0.029). Younger physicians and cardiologists were significantly more likely to prescribe short-term oral anticoagulation after acute cardioversion in low-risk atrial fibrillation patients compared to older physicians or those in other specialties (p=0.049 and p=0.029, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: