Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We show that there appears to be a publication bias against non-significant results in the biological literature. We suggest reasons why non-significant results are not published, the implications of not publishing non-significant results, and why we need to correct the problem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Csada et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: