Key result
Novel two-step pharmacokinetic assessment detects ~100% more spironolactone non-adherence versus traditional testing.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate adherence to spironolactone in patients with arterial hypertension using a novel two-step decision scheme based on spironolactone and canrenone pharmacokinetics.
Does a two-step pharmacokinetic approach improve the detection of non-adherence to spironolactone compared to traditional serum concentration testing in patients with arterial hypertension?
Observational (n=92)
No
Does a two-step pharmacokinetic approach improve the detection of non-adherence to spironolactone compared to traditional serum concentration testing in patients with arterial hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: 25.4% vs 12.7%
A two-step pharmacokinetic approach utilizing both spironolactone and its metabolite canrenone significantly improves the detection of non-adherence in patients with resistant hypertension compared to traditional drug level monitoring.
May enhance non-adherence detection in resistant hypertension; hypothesis-generating before practice change.
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence to spironolactone in a group of unselected patients with arterial hypertension by analysis of measured serum spironolactone and canrenone concentrations according to a proposed two-step decision scheme based on pharmacokinetic considerations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Simulation of serum concentration-time profiles of spironolactone and canrenone based on population pharmacokinetic parameters described in literature and a body weight-normalized spironolactone dose / canrenone level nomogram derived from a group of adherent patients with conservatively treated primary hyperaldosteronism, were used to create a two-step decision scheme. 71 outpatients treated with spironolactone for resistant hypertension with spironolactone and canrenone serum concentrations measured between 2018 and 2021 were analyzed according to the proposed scheme. We compared our proposed methodology to the standard approach for adherence testing. RESULTS: With the most sensitive traditional approach to adherence assessment through detectable serum concentrations of spironolactone and/or canrenone, 9 (12.7%) non-adherent patients were identified. With our two-step assessment of adherence, we were able to identify 18 (25.4%) non-adherent patients. CONCLUSION: Consideration of the pharmacokinetic properties of parental drug and its metabolite led to improved sensitivity in non-adherence detection in patients with arterial hypertension. This approach enables better interpretation of measured spironolactone and canrenone serum concentrations and should be used in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pilková et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Resistant arterial hypertension (n=92). Two-step pharmacokinetic adherence assessment vs. Traditional adherence assessment (detectable serum concentrations) was evaluated on Detection of non-adherence. A novel two-step pharmacokinetic assessment of spironolactone and canrenone serum concentrations identified 25.4% of patients as non-adherent, compared to 12.7% detected by the traditional approach.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: