Key result
Adjunctive ablation strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation may provide incremental benefits in maintaining sinus rhythm for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Do adjunctive ablation strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation improve outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Do adjunctive ablation strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation improve outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
This review summarizes the current evidence and state-of-the-art techniques for adjunctive ablation strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Supports further investigation of adjunctive ablation; does not yet justify changes to clinical practice in persistent AF.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia. Recent guidelines recommend pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) as the main procedural endpoint to control recurrent AF in symptomatic patients resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs. The efficacy of such procedure is higher in paroxysmal AF while is still unsatisfactory in persistent and long-standing persistent AF. This review will summarize the state-of-the-art of AF ablation techniques in patients with persistent AF, discussing the evidence underlying different approaches with a particular focus on adjunctive ablation strategies beyond PVI including linear ablation, ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE), ablation of ganglionated plexi, dominant frequency, rotors and other anatomical sites frequently involved in AF triggers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magnani et al. (2015) conducted a review in Persistent atrial fibrillation. Adjunct ablation strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation vs. Pulmonary vein isolation alone was evaluated. Adjunctive ablation strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation may provide incremental benefits in maintaining sinus rhythm for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: