Key result
Aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis carries a significant operative mortality risk of approximately 4.0%, which varies according to patient comorbidities and disease presentation.
This review highlights the importance of echocardiography and risk modeling in evaluating patients with aortic stenosis and selecting candidates for aortic valve replacement.
Warrants caution in high-comorbidity aortic stenosis patients; leaves open prospective validation of contemporary risk models.
The true incidence of aortic stenosis among the general population is unknown but aortic sclerosis, its precursor, has been estimated to affect about 25% of people over age 65, while an estimated 3% of the population over age 75 have severe aortic stenosis. Severe aortic stenosis, when accompanied by symptoms of angina, syncope, or heart failure, is associated with high mortality rates. Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography are cornerstone tools for the evaluation and monitoring of aortic stenosis. Echocardiography helps identify the patient at risk of death and guide timing of aortic valve replacement. Other important diagnostic tools include cardiac catheterization, treadmill stress testing, and dobutamine stress echocardiography, although their use is limited to specific patient populations. Aortic valve replacement carries a significant operative risk of approximately 4.0%. However, risk of operative mortality varies according to comorbidities and disease presentation. There are many risk models that guide estimation of the risk of operative mortality. Understanding operative risk is important in patient care and the selection of patients for aortic valve replacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeo et al. (2007) conducted a review in Aortic Stenosis. Aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis carries a significant operative mortality risk of approximately 4.0%, which varies according to patient comorbidities and disease presentation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: