Study 1 (N=205) reveals that witnesses often provide vague descriptions. Witnesses leave out information such as sex and race that they certainly noticed (default values). Study 2 (N=89) weakly supports the claim (Luus & Wells, 1991) that correct identification rates from lineups are enhanced by selecting foils who fit the description of the criminal rather than foils who are highly similar to the suspect. Study 3 (N=210) indicates that false identification rates can be inflated by selecting lineup foils who fit vague descriptions of the criminal but otherwise differ from the suspect on default values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindsay et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: