Key result
Multiple extensive substrate modification ablations in persistent AF patients were associated with significantly lower median left atrial active emptying fraction (13% vs 32%, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Do multiple catheter ablations for persistent atrial fibrillation impair active atrial function and increase atrial scar burden compared to no prior ablation?
Observational (n=37)
Do multiple catheter ablations for persistent atrial fibrillation impair active atrial function and increase atrial scar burden compared to no prior ablation?
Multiple extensive ablation procedures for persistent AF are associated with significantly impaired active left atrial function and increased LA scar burden.
Potential LA dysfunction after multiple ablations merits caution in repeat procedures; leaves open effects on outcomes and optimal strategy.
Background Extensive and repeated substrate modification (SM) is frequently performed as an ablation strategy in persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF). The effect of these extended ablation strategies on atrial function has not been investigated sufficiently so far. The purpose was to assess atrial function by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and its association with left atrial (LA) scar burden by electroanatomical voltage‐mapping after multiple persAF ablation procedures. Methods We included 16 persAF patients who had ≥2 SM procedures and a control group (CG) of 21 persAF patients without prior ablation. CMR was performed in sinus rhythm at least 4 weeks after the last cardioversion. Active left and right (RA) atrial emptying fractions (AEF) as well as peak active left atrial appendage (LAA) emptying velocities were obtained by CMR flow measurements. Furthermore, LA scar burden was quantified on electroanatomical voltage maps by the portion of points with local voltage amplitude <0.2 mV. Results We found median LA‐AEF to be lower (13 [9–22] vs 32 [26–36] %, P < 0.001) and median LA scar burden to be higher (40 [20–68] vs nine [3–18] %, P < 0.05) in the SM group compared with the CG. Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between mean LA voltage and LA‐AEF (r 2 = 0.62, P < 0.001). No significant differences were detected with respect to median RA‐AEF (41 [28–48] vs 47 [35–50] %, P = 0.43) and median peak LAA emptying velocities (30 [16–40] vs 17 [13–28] cm/s, P = 0.07). Conclusions Active LA function is preserved but significantly impaired and associated with ablation‐related LA scar burden after multiple extensive persAF ablations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nührich et al. (2016) conducted an observational in persistent atrial fibrillation (n=37). Multiple substrate modification (SM) ablation procedures vs. No prior ablation was evaluated on Active left atrial emptying fraction (LA-AEF) (p=<0.001). Multiple extensive substrate modification ablations in persistent AF patients were associated with significantly lower median left atrial active emptying fraction (13% vs 32%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: