Key result
Repeated AF ablation is linked to steeper left atrial strain decline, worsening to -23.7%/year.
Why the study?
The impact of repeated AF ablations on left atrial mechanical function remains uncertain, with limited long-term follow-up data.
Does repeated catheter ablation reduce left atrial mechanical function compared to the natural progression of atrial fibrillation in patients with recurrent AF?
Observational (n=108)
No
Does repeated catheter ablation reduce left atrial mechanical function compared to the natural progression of atrial fibrillation in patients with recurrent AF?
Repeated catheter ablations for AF decrease left atrial mechanical function, but this decline is less detrimental than the mechanical decline caused by the natural progression of recurrent AF itself.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Repeated ablation-associated LA strain decline warrants caution; leaves open whether natural AF progression dominates or repeats add net harm.
Introduction The impact of repeated atrial fibrillation (AF) ablations on left atrial (LA) mechanical function remains uncertain, with limited long‐term follow‐up data. Methods This retrospective study involved 108 AF patients who underwent two catheter ablations with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) done before and 3 months after each of the ablations from 2010 to 2021. The rate of change in peak longitudinal atrial strain (PLAS) assessed LA function. Additionally, a sub‐study of 36 patients who underwent an extra MRI before the second ablation, gave us an additional time segment to evaluate the basis of change in PLAS. Results In the two‐ablation, three MRI sub‐study 1, the PLAS percent change rate was similar before and after the first ablation ( r 11 = − 0.9 ± 3.1%/year, p = 0.771). However, the strain change rate from postablation 1 to postablation 2 was significantly worse ( r 12 = − 23.7 ± 4.8%/year, p < 0.001). In the sub‐study 2 with four MRIs, all three rates were negative, with reductions from postablation 1 to pre‐ablation 2 ( r 22 = − 13.3 ± 2.6%/year, p < 0.001) and from pre‐ablation 2 to postablation 2 ( r 23 = −8.9 ± 3.9%/year, p = 0.028) being significant. Conclusion The present study suggests that the more ablations performed, the more significant the decrease in the postablation mechanical function of the LA. The natural progression of AF (strain change from postablation 1 to pre‐ablation 2) had a greater negative influence on LA mechanical function compared to the second ablation itself suggesting that second ablation in patients with recurrence after first ablation is an effective strategy even from the LA mechanical function aspect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=108). Repeated catheter ablations vs. First catheter ablation was evaluated on Rate of change in peak longitudinal atrial strain (PLAS) (%/year) (p=<0.001). Repeated catheter ablations for atrial fibrillation were associated with a significant decline in left atrial mechanical function, with the rate of peak longitudinal atrial strain worsening from -0.9%/year after the first ablation to -23.7%/year after the second ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: