Key result
Ablation Index-guided radiofrequency PVI yields similar long-term freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias versus control.
Why the study?
The short- and long-term outcomes of radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation using the Ablation Index module compared to without it in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF required evaluation.
Does radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation using the 'Ablation Index' module improve freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=286)
Does radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation using the 'Ablation Index' module improve freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 58.1% vs 62.3%
p-value: p=0.667
The use of the Ablation Index module during radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation significantly reduces procedure duration and early recurrences, but does not significantly improve long-term freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias compared to standard contact force sensing.
Caution against adopting Ablation Index for long-term gains; leaves open its value in randomized trials.
Aim . Comparative evaluation of short-term and long-term outcomes of radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation using the “Ablation Index” module versus without in patients with paroxysmal and persistent forms of atrial fibrillation. Methods . The study included 286 patients with paroxysmal and persistent forms of atrial fibrillation, divided into 2 groups: the study group (110 patients) underwent radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation using the “Ablation Index” module, while the control group (176 patients) underwent isolation without the use of the “Ablation Index” module. Results . The average follow-up period was 38.1±9.6 months. There was no significant difference in freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias in the long-term follow-up between the study and control groups (58.1% vs. 62.3%, p=0.667), or in the number of perioperative complications (3.6% vs. 8.5%, p=0.106). A significant reduction in the duration of the procedure was observed when using the “Ablation Index” module (92.7±20.9 min vs. 126.4±29.2 min, p<0.001), as well as in the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation in the blanking period (1.8% vs. 8.5%, p=0.020). Conclusion . Interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation under the control of the “Ablation Index” module shows significantly lower recurrence rates of atrial tachyarrhythmias in the blanking period and comparable safety and long-term efficacy results compared to interventional treatment using catheters with contact force sensor over a period of more than three years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azizov et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal and persistent forms of atrial fibrillation (n=286). Radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation using the Ablation Index module vs. Radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation without the Ablation Index module was evaluated on Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias in the long-term follow-up (p=0.667). Radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation using the Ablation Index module resulted in similar long-term freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias compared to control (58.1% vs. 62.3%, p=0.667).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: