Key result
ABLATION trial compares bi-atrial versus left atrial ablation for arrhythmia freedom in rheumatic mitral disease.
Why the study?
AF is common in patients with RMVD and increases stroke and death risk, but whether bi-atrial or left atrial ablation is preferred during mitral valve surgery remains controversial.
Does bi-atrial ablation improve freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias compared to left atrial ablation in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=320)
1:1
Yes
Does bi-atrial ablation improve freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias compared to left atrial ablation in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
This study protocol outlines a randomized trial to determine whether bi-atrial ablation is superior to left atrial ablation for maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease (RMVD) and increase the risk of stroke and death. Bi-atrial or left atrial ablation remains controversial for treatment of AF during mitral valve surgery. The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of bi-atrial ablation with those of left atrial ablation among patients with RMVD and persistent or long-standing persistent AF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ABLATION trial (Bi-atrial vs Left Atrial Ablation for Patients with RMVD and Non-paroxysmal AF) is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study. The trial will randomly assign 320 patients with RMVD and persistent or long-standing persistent AF to bi-atrial ablation procedure or left atrial ablation procedure in a 1:1 randomisation. The primary end point is freedom from documented AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia of >30 s at 12 months after surgery off antiarrhythmic drugs. Key secondary end point is the probability of freedom from permanent pacemaker implantation at 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the probability of freedom from any recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias with antiarrhythmic drugs, AF burden, incidence of adverse events and cardiac function documented by echocardiography at 12 months after operation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The central ethics committee at Fuwai Hospital approved the ABLATION trial. The results of this study will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05021601.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Rheumatic mitral valve disease and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=320). Bi-atrial ablation vs. Left atrial ablation was evaluated on Freedom from documented AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia of >30 s at 12 months after surgery off antiarrhythmic drugs. The ABLATION trial will randomize 320 patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to bi-atrial or left atrial ablation to evaluate 12-month arrhythmia freedom.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: