Key result
Increased biatrial volume assessed by CMR independently predicted atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (213.1 vs 164.1 mL, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does biatrial volume estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=100)
Does biatrial volume estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
p-value: p=<0.001
Biatrial volume assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is an independent predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation and may improve prognostic stratification compared to left or right atrial volume alone.
May refine pre-PVI recurrence risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Introduction The predictive value of left atrial volume (LAV) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is known, but the relationship of right atrial volume (RAV) and biatrial volume (BAV) with AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is not clear. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging allows us to more precisely quantify atrial volume. We investigated LAV, RAV, and BAV as predictors of AF recurrence following PVI in AF patients. Methods and Results We assessed 100 AF patients (age = 59.8 ± 9.5 years, 74 males, 26 females) who underwent nonenhanced CMR before their first PVI. LAV and RAV were measured using CMR. All patients were in sinus rhythm during CMR. BAV was calculated as the sum of LAV and RAV. During the 8‐month follow‐up, AF recurrence occurred in 23 patients. LAV, RAV, and BAV were significantly greater in patients with AF recurrence than in those without (LAV, 103.7 ± 25.8 vs 81.8 ± 24.2 mL, P < 0.001; RAV, 109.4 ± 27.0 vs 82.2 ± 19.6 mL, P < 0.001; BAV, 213.1 ± 46.7 vs 164.1 ± 38.7 mL, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that increased LAV, RAV, and BAV were significantly correlated with AF recurrence. The area under the receiver operation characteristic curve for BAV showed the largest value compared to that of LAV or RAV alone. Conclusions LAV, RAV, and BAV were independent predictors of AF recurrence after PVI. Quantifying BAV may additionally improve prognostic stratification compared with LAV or RAV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumagai et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=100). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for biatrial volume assessment was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation recurrence (p=<0.001). Increased biatrial volume assessed by CMR independently predicted atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (213.1 vs 164.1 mL, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: