Why the study?
Although left atrial volume and low voltage areas mark worse rhythm outcomes after AF ablation and increased right atrial volume predicts arrhythmia recurrence, the association between the LAV/RAV ratio and low voltage areas was unknown.
Does a left atrial volume greater than right atrial volume (LAV > RAV) predict the presence of low voltage areas in patients undergoing first AF ablation?
Does a left atrial volume greater than right atrial volume (LAV > RAV) predict the presence of low voltage areas in patients undergoing first AF ablation?
A left atrial volume greater than right atrial volume (LAV > RAV) on pre-procedural CMR is a strong independent predictor of low voltage areas in patients undergoing first AF ablation.
LAV/RAV ratio may identify AF patients with LVAs; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Background Left atrial volume (LAV) and low voltage areas (LVAs) are acknowledged markers for worse rhythm outcome after ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Some studies reported the importance of increased right atrial volume (RAV) as a predictor for arrhythmia recurrences in AF patients. Objective To investigate association between the LAV/RAV ratio and LVAs presence. Methods Patients undergoing first AF ablation were included. LVAs were assessed peri‐procedurally using high‐density 3D maps and defined as <0.5 mV. All patients underwent pre‐procedural cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. LAV (biplane) and RAV (monoplane 4‐chamber) were assessed prior to ablation, and the LAV/RAV ratio was calculated. Results The study population included 189 patients (age mean 63 ± 10 years, 33% women, 57% persistent AF, 22% LVAs). There were 149 (79%) patients with LAV > RAV. In univariable analysis LAV > RAV was associated with LVAs (OR 6.803, 95%CI 1.395–26.514, p = .016). The association remained robust in multivariable model after adjustment for persistent AF, CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score, and heart rate (OR 5.981, 95%CI 1.256–28.484, p = .025). Using receiver operator curve analysis, LAV > RAV (AUC 0.668, 95%CI 0.585–0.751, p = .001) was significant predictor for LVAs. In multivariable analysis, after adjustment for age, persistent AF, and renal function, RAV≥LAV was threefold higher in males (OR 3.040, 95%CI 1.050–8.802, p = .04). Conclusions LAV > RAV is useful for the prediction of electro‐anatomical substrate in AF. LAV > RAV was associated with LVAs presence, while male sex remained associated with RAV≥LAV and less LVAs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seewöster et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: