Key result
MLCK and PKA phosphorylation both increased cross-bridge proximity to actin, but only MLCK reduced interfilament spacing by 2 nm (3.5%), explaining its unique effect on Ca(2+) sensitivity.
RLC and cMyBP-C phosphorylation modulate the kinetics of cardiac force development by increasing cross-bridge proximity to actin, but only RLC phosphorylation affects lattice spacing to increase Ca2+ sensitivity.
MLCK-specific lattice effects extend sarcomere regulation mechanisms; leaves open human HF relevance.
Phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain (RLC) by myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) and myosin binding protein-C (cMyBP-C) by protein kinase A (PKA) independently accelerate the kinetics of force development in ventricular myocardium. However, while MLCK treatment has been shown to increase the Ca(2+) sensitivity of force (pCa(50)), PKA treatment has been shown to decrease pCa(50), presumably due to cardiac troponin I phosphorylation. Further, MLCK treatment increases Ca(2+)-independent force and maximum Ca(2+)-activated force, whereas PKA treatment has no effect on either force. To investigate the structural basis underlying the kinase-specific differential effects on steady-state force, we used synchrotron low-angle X-ray diffraction to compare equatorial intensity ratios (I(1,1)/I(1,0)) to assess the proximity of myosin cross-bridge mass relative to actin and to compare lattice spacings (d(1,0)) to assess the inter-thick filament spacing in skinned myocardium following treatment with either MLCK or PKA. As we showed previously, PKA phosphorylation of cMyBP-C increases I(1,1)/I(1,0) and, as hypothesized, treatment with MLCK also increased I(1,1)/I(1,0), which can explain the accelerated rates of force development during activation. Importantly, interfilament spacing was reduced by 2 nm (3.5%) with MLCK treatment, but did not change with PKA treatment. Thus, RLC or cMyBP-C phosphorylation increases the proximity of cross-bridges to actin, but only RLC phosphorylation affects lattice spacing, which suggests that RLC and cMyBP-C modulate the kinetics of force development by similar structural mechanisms; however, the effect of RLC phosphorylation to increase the Ca(2+) sensitivity of force is mediated by a distinct mechanism, most probably involving changes in interfilament spacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colson et al. (2010) studied cardiac force development. MLCK treatment vs. PKA treatment was evaluated on equatorial intensity ratios (I(1,1)/I(1,0)) and lattice spacings (d(1,0)). MLCK and PKA phosphorylation both increased cross-bridge proximity to actin, but only MLCK reduced interfilament spacing by 2 nm (3.5%), explaining its unique effect on Ca(2+) sensitivity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: