Key result
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients showed no significant rest-to-peak change in arterial-end-tidal PCO2 difference (4.5±2.4 to 4.3±2.2 mm Hg, p>0.40), indicating persistent alveolar wasted ventilation similar to advanced heart failure patients.
Why the study?
Does continuous-flow LVAD implantation improve exercise ventilation/perfusion matching compared to advanced HFrEF patients?
Observational (n=55)
No
Does continuous-flow LVAD implantation improve exercise ventilation/perfusion matching compared to advanced HFrEF patients?
LVAD recipients exhibit exercise gas exchange characterized by alveolar wasted ventilation similar to advanced HFrEF patients, which is related to right ventriculo-arterial coupling and circulating effective volume.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LVAD recipients show persistent exercise alveolar wasted ventilation; hypothesis-generating for right ventricular coupling effects on gas exchange.
Exercise ventilation/perfusion matching in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients (LVAD) has not been studied systematically. Twenty-five LVAD and two groups of 15 reduced ejection fraction chronic heart failure (HFrEF) patients with peak VO 2 matched to that of LVAD (HFrEF-matched) and !14 ml/kg/min (HFrEF!14), respectively, underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing with arterial blood gas analysis, echocardiogram and venous blood sampling for renal function evaluation. Arterial-end-tidal PCO 2 difference (P(a-ET)CO 2 ) and physiological dead space-tidal volume ratio (VD/VT) were used as descriptors of alveolar and total wasted ventilation, respectively. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure ratio (TAPSE/PASP) and blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio were calculated in all patients and used as surrogates of right ventriculo-arterial coupling and circulating effective volume, respectively. LVAD and HFrEFmatched showed no rest-to-peak change of P(a-ET)CO 2 (4.52.4 vs. 4.32.2 mm Hg and 4.11.4 vs. 3.82.5 mm Hg, respectively, both p >0.40), whereas a decrease was observed in HFrEF!14 (6.53.6 vs. 2.82.0 mm Hg, p <0.0001). Rest-to-peak changes of P(a-ET) CO 2 correlated to those of VD/VT (r = 0.70, p <0.0001). Multiple regression indicated TAPSE/PASP and blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio as independent predictors of peak P (a-ET)CO 2 . LVAD exercise gas exchange is characterized by alveolar wasted ventilation, i.e. hypoperfusion of ventilated alveoli, similar to that of advanced HFrEF patients and related to surrogates of right ventriculo-arterial coupling and circulating effective volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mezzani et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) (n=55). Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) vs. HFrEF patients matched for peak VO2 and HFrEF patients with peak VO2 ≥14 ml/kg/min was evaluated on Rest-to-peak change of arterial-end-tidal PCO2 difference (P(a-ET)CO2) (p=0.001). Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients showed no significant rest-to-peak change in arterial-end-tidal PCO2 difference (4.5±2.4 to 4.3±2.2 mm Hg, p>0.40), indicating persistent alveolar wasted ventilation similar to advanced heart failure patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: