Why the study?
Should aspirin be skipped in favor of other oral antiplatelet agents in patients requiring cardiovascular prevention?
Should aspirin be skipped in favor of other oral antiplatelet agents in patients requiring cardiovascular prevention?
The review argues against skipping aspirin in cardiovascular prevention, highlighting its unique mechanism and the lack of sufficient data to support alternative regimens.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No data to support skipping aspirin for CV prevention; leaves open whether alternatives match its role.
Since more than 20 years, aspirin is an approved and established first-line antiplatelet medication in cardiovascular prevention. This is partially due to ist unique mode of action which is not shared with any other antiplatelet agent as well by the reliability of its pharmacological efficacy: inhibition of platelet COX-1 and subsequent thromboxane formation in almost every patient. Aspirin acts synergistic with ADP-antagonists in dual antiplatelet therapy of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and is also approved for long-term secondary prevention. Patients with atrial fibrillation are an exception and benefit more from anticoagulants. After the introduction of the new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), i.e. direct inhibitors of factor Xa or thrombin formation, there is a renewed discussion about the role of antiplatelet agents, specifically if additional dual antiplatelet treatment is still necessary for an optimum clinical effect or whether one component, such as aspirin might be skipped in favor of other classes of oral antiplatelet agents, such as ADP-antagonists. The available data are insufficient to recommend this because of a low number of studies and a still uncertain benefit/risk (bleeding) ratio. More research on aspirin as a chemopreventive appears also to be necessary and is going on, in particular in individuals at high-risk for vascular thrombotic diseases (diabetics, preeclampsia, venous thromboembolism).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karsten Schrör (2015) conducted an editorial in Cardiovascular prevention. Aspirin was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: