Key result
Cryoballoon ablation is associated with ~100% greater reduction in baroreceptor function versus RFA in paroxysmal AF.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation affects autonomic nervous system balance, but baroreceptor function assessment to measure parasympathetic activity has been rarely used in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF.
Does cryoballoon ablation compared to radiofrequency ablation differentially affect baroreceptor function in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=78)
Open-label
No
Does cryoballoon ablation compared to radiofrequency ablation differentially affect baroreceptor function in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 12% vs 6%
p-value: p=0.004
Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation significantly decreases baroreceptor function, with a more pronounced effect observed after cryoballoon compared to radiofrequency ablation.
BACKGROUND: The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a significant role in atrial fibrillation (AF). Catheter ablation (CA) affects the ANS balance. The assessment of baroreceptor (BR) function is an established method to measure parasympathetic activity; however, it has been rarely used in patients undergoing CA of AF. AIMS: This study is to assess changes in BR function caused by CA and to compare these changes between two different types of CA: point-by-point radiofrequency (RF) versus cryoballoon (CB). METHODS: In this observational, prospective, single center study, 78 patients (25 females, mean age 58 ± 9) with paroxysmal AF and first CA were included: 39 patients (RF group) and 39 (CB group). The BR function was assessed non-invasively using tilt testing and three parameters: event count (BREC) depicting overall BR activity, slope mean depicting BR sensitivity (BRS), and BR effectiveness index (BEI). RESULTS: The groups did not differ in clinical or demographic data. Before CA, tilting caused a marked decrease in BR function parameters in the whole study group (BREC (29 ± 14.0-50.0 vs 28 ± 9.0-44.0, p < 0.068), BRS (10.2 ± 7.1-13.2 vs 5.8 ± 4.9-8.5; p < 0.001), and BEI (52.9 ± 39.9-65.5 vs 39.6 ± 23.6-52.1; p < 0.001), supine vs tilting, respectively). These changes were similar in the both groups. After CA, BR function decreased in the whole group (BREC 12.0 ± 3.0-22.0 vs 6.0 ± 3.0-18.0, p = 0.004; BRS 4.8 ± 3.6-6.8 vs 4.0 ± 3.0-5.8, p = 0.014; BEI 18.7 ± 8.3-27.4 vs 12.0 ± 5.1-21.0, p = 0.009). BREC was significantly more decreased in the CB vs RF. Similar trend was noted for BRS and BEI. CONCLUSIONS: CA significantly affects BR function. These changes were more pronounced following CB rather than RF CA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Żuk et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=78). Cryoballoon ablation vs. Radiofrequency ablation was evaluated on Baroreceptor event count (BREC) after ablation (p=0.004). Cryoballoon ablation caused a significantly more pronounced reduction in baroreceptor function compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: