Key result
Oscillometric blood pressure algorithms using irregularity index and RMSSD detected atrial fibrillation with sensitivities of 98.6% and 98.2% and specificities of 96.0% and 90.8%, respectively.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
Do algorithms implemented on oscillometric blood pressure devices accurately detect atrial fibrillation compared to diagnostic ECG in clinic participants?
Cross-Sectional (n=569)
Single-blind
Yes
Do algorithms implemented on oscillometric blood pressure devices accurately detect atrial fibrillation compared to diagnostic ECG in clinic participants?
Oscillometric blood pressure devices using RMSSD and Irrx algorithms demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity for detecting atrial fibrillation, suggesting potential utility for cost-effective widespread screening.
Promising accuracy in cross-sectional clinic data supports further testing; leaves open prospective validation before routine AF screening use.
Atrial fibrillation (Afib) contributes significantly to overall cardiovascular risk. Widespread screening for Afib in primary care is sometimes performed by palpation, but suffers from low accuracy and is dependent on clinician experience. Algorithms implemented on oscillometric blood pressure devices can detect Afib with high sensitivity and specificity, but information on factors affecting accuracy is scant. Concurrent diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG) and oscillometry were measured in participants in ECG clinics at two sites. Root mean squared successive difference (RMSSD) and irregularity index (Irrx) were calculated from oscillometric data and used to train logistic regression classifiers. Monte Carlo cross validation with 20 splits was performed to estimate confidence intervals for mean sensitivity and specificity, with various weightings, in the absence or presence of ectopics, and with or without repeated measurements. 707 measurements, including 168 Afib, were collected from 569 participants with mean (standard deviation) age of 63 (16) years. Sensitivity/specificity of RMSSD and Irrx were 0.982/0.908 and 0.986/0.960 respectively when ectopics were included. Excluding ectopics from the data improved specificity by up to 5%. Nevertheless, based on this performance and after accounting for prevalence of Afib in the population aged over 60 years, and estimated costs of healthcare, oscillometric screening for Afib in this age group could return a positive net health-economic benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lowe et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial Fibrillation (n=569). Oscillometric blood pressure measurement algorithms (RMSSD and Irrx) vs. 12-lead ECG was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity for detecting atrial fibrillation. Oscillometric blood pressure algorithms using irregularity index and RMSSD detected atrial fibrillation with sensitivities of 98.6% and 98.2% and specificities of 96.0% and 90.8%, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: