Key result
BPA and PEA are associated with similar 6-month quality of life improvements in CTEPH.
Why the study?
Studies evaluating quality of life after pulmonary endarterectomy or balloon pulmonary angioplasty in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension had not compared quality of life between both procedures in a randomized cohort.
Does balloon pulmonary angioplasty improve quality of life similarly to pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with CTEPH?
Observational (n=99)
Yes
Does balloon pulmonary angioplasty improve quality of life similarly to pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with CTEPH?
Both balloon pulmonary angioplasty and pulmonary endarterectomy provide similar improvements in quality of life for patients with CTEPH at 6 months.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Similar QoL gains seen with BPA and PEA in CTEPH; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Background: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is most commonly treated with pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) or with a combination of pulmonary vasodilators and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA). Quality of life (QoL) after treatment is one of many factors used to determine which procedure is most suitable for each patient. Studies evaluating QoL after these interventions have not compared QoL between both procedures in a randomized cohort. In this prospective registry study, we explored QoL as an outcome in patients treated with PEA or BPA treatment and which factors correlated to QoL. Methods: CTEPH patients treated in Amsterdam University Medical Center and Aarhus University Hospital, the living with pulmonary hypertension questionnaire (LPHQ) was recorded to assess QoL before treatment and 6 months after treatment. Multiple pulmonary and hemodynamic parameters were recorded as part of standard clinical care. Results: At baseline 99 LPHQ questionnaires were answered and 67 at 6 months. Baseline parameters did not differ significantly between patients undergoing PEA vs BPA. QoL was similar at baseline in both treatment groups, and both groups experienced a similar improvement in QoL after treatment. The New York Heart Association (NYHA) score and Borg score after the six-minute walking distance (6MWD) were most strongly correlated to QoL at all time points. Baseline carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO) was inversely correlated to QoL after treatment. Presence of residual PH was not associated with significantly decreased QoL. Conclusions: We did not find evidence that QoL differed in 2 separate groups of patients who underwent either BPA or PEA. Multiple parameters pertaining to dyspnea and basic functionality were moderately correlated to QoL, this was not the case for hemodynamic parameters. These results indicate that when determining invasive treatment in CTEPH, QoL can be expected to improve with both treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smeele et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) (n=99). Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) vs. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) was evaluated on Quality of life (QoL) assessed by the living with pulmonary hypertension questionnaire (LPHQ) at 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: