Key result
Applying the 2017 AAP guidelines increased the prevalence of high-risk hypertension by 13% compared to the 2016 ESH guidelines in overweight/obese youth.
Why the study?
Does the application of AAPG2017 compared to ESHG2016 increase the prevalence of hypertension and better identify abnormal left ventricular geometry in overweight/obese youth?
Observational (n=6,137)
Does the application of AAPG2017 compared to ESHG2016 increase the prevalence of hypertension and better identify abnormal left ventricular geometry in overweight/obese youth?
The 2017 AAP guidelines classify more overweight/obese youth as having high-risk hypertension compared to the 2016 ESH guidelines, and juvenile echocardiographic cut-offs better identify those with target organ damage.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support AAP 2017 for detecting LV remodeling in obese youth; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the impact of the European Society of Hypertension Guidelines 2016 (ESHG2016) and the American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines 2017 (AAPG2017) on the screening of hypertension and classification of abnormal left ventricular geometry (ALVG) in overweight/obese youth. METHODS: This study included 6137 overweight/obese youth; 437 had echocardiographic assessment. Hypertension was defined using either ESHG2016 or AAPG2017. ALVG was defined using 95th percentile for age and sex of left ventricular mass index (LVMi) and/or relative wall thickness (RWT) more than 0.38 (juvenile cut-offs) according to ESHG2016 or LVMi more than 51 g/h and/or RWT more than 0.42 (adult cut-offs) according to AAPG2017. RESULTS: Prevalence of youth at a high risk of hypertension was 13% higher using AAPG2017 than ESHG2016. The increase was larger in overweight youth at least 13 years of age (+43%). Using the juvenile cut-offs for ALVG, youth at a high risk of hypertension by ESHG2016 had an odds ratio [95% confidence interval (95% CI)] of 3.03 (1.31-7.05) for left ventricular concentric remodelling (LVcr) and 2.53 (1.43-4.47) for concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (cLVH) as compared with youth with normal LVG. Similarly, in youth at a high risk of hypertension by AAPG2017, the odds ratio for LVcr was 3.28 (1.45-7.41, P < 0.001) and 3.02 (95% CI: 1.73-5.27, P < 0.001) for cLVH. Using the adult cut-offs, no significant difference in ALVG was found with both guidelines. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of overweight/obese youth at a high risk of hypertension increased by 13% comparing AAPG2017 vs. ESHG2016. The juvenile cut-offs for ALVG were more effective than the adult criteria in intercepting individuals with a potentially higher cardiovascular risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonito et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Overweight/obese youth (n=6,137). American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines 2017 (AAPG2017) vs. European Society of Hypertension Guidelines 2016 (ESHG2016) was evaluated on Prevalence of high risk of hypertension and abnormal left ventricular geometry (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.45-7.41, p=<0.001). Applying the 2017 AAP guidelines increased the prevalence of high-risk hypertension by 13% compared to the 2016 ESH guidelines in overweight/obese youth.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: