Comparison of the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics with the fourth report and the 2016 European Society of Hypertension guidelines for the diagnosis of hypertension and the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 2017, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended new blood pressure (BP) thresholds for the diagnosis of hypertension in children and adolescents. We assessed the impact of the AAP guideline, as compared to the Fourth Report and the 2016 European Society of Hypertension guidelines (ESH), on the prevalence of hypertension and the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). METHODS: We systematically searched for studies evaluating the impact of the 2017 AAP guidelines on the prevalence of hypertension and LVH compared with the Fourth Report or the 2016 ESH guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed to compare the overall risk of LVH between the guidelines. We used a random-effects model to synthesize quantitative data. RESULTS: We included 18 observational studies in the systematic review with an overall moderate to high risk of bias. The AAP guideline identified more children with hypertension than the Fourth Report and the ESH guidelines. In the meta-analysis of three observational studies, the guidelines revealed similar associations with LVH [odds ratio (OR) = 3.89, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.68-8.99 for AAP and OR = 3.19, 95% CI 1.14-8.88 for Fourth Report/ESH guidelines]. Qualitative analysis of two observational studies revealed similar predictive value of the guidelines for LVH in adult life. CONCLUSION: Despite the higher prevalence of hypertension frequently reported by the adoption of AAP guideline BP thresholds compared with Fourth Report and the ESH guidelines, the new thresholds have not been proved to advance assessment of cardiovascular risk in terms of LVH currently the most accepted subclinical marker in youth.