Key result
PM101 demonstrated bioequivalence to standard intravenous amiodarone in healthy participants, with an AUC0-72 geometric ratio of 1.03 (95% CI 1.00-1.06).
Why the study?
Does PM101 (a new cyclodextrin-based formulation of intravenous amiodarone) demonstrate bioequivalence to standard intravenous amiodarone in healthy participants?
RCT (n=88)
Double-blind
Crossover
Does PM101 (a new cyclodextrin-based formulation of intravenous amiodarone) demonstrate bioequivalence to standard intravenous amiodarone in healthy participants?
PM101, a new cyclodextrin-based formulation of intravenous amiodarone, is bioequivalent to standard intravenous amiodarone in healthy participants.
May support PM101 as an alternative IV amiodarone formulation; confirms bioequivalence and extends options for patient trials.
Intravenous amiodarone is an effective agent for the treatment of recurrent ventricular fibrillation and hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia. PM101 is a new formulation of intravenous amiodarone that uses a cyclodextrin to maintain amiodarone in the aqueous phase. Eighty-eight participants were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, crossover, bioequivalence clinical study and were treated with single doses (150 mg) of PM101 and intravenous amiodarone separated by a washout period of at least 42 days. Venous blood samples were taken periodically during the first 72 hours after dosing to determine standard pharmacokinetic parameters. The amiodarone plasma concentration-time curve observed with both formulations was virtually identical, as was the 72-hour area under the curve (AUC0-72). Similar equivalence was seen for desethylamiodarone, the active metabolite of amiodarone. The geometric ratios of the AUC0-72 for amiodarone and desethylamiodarone were 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.06) and 1.01 (0.99-1.03), respectively. Similar geometric ratios and CIs were found for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and for AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-infinity). Because the ratios and their CI fell between the limits of 0.8 and 1.25, bioequivalence of these 2 formulations was established. No safety concerns unique to PM101 were identified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cushing et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Healthy participants (n=88). PM101 (new formulation of intravenous amiodarone) vs. Standard intravenous amiodarone was evaluated on 72-hour area under the curve (AUC0-72) for amiodarone (Geometric ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06). PM101 demonstrated bioequivalence to standard intravenous amiodarone in healthy participants, with an AUC0-72 geometric ratio of 1.03 (95% CI 1.00-1.06).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology