Key result
Measuring total pulmonary arterial compliance using MR flow data and invasive pressure measurements is feasible, demonstrating good agreement between two estimation methods (r=0.98, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Can total pulmonary arterial compliance be quantified using MR flow data and invasive pressure measurements in patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension or congenital heart disease?
Observational (n=17)
Can total pulmonary arterial compliance be quantified using MR flow data and invasive pressure measurements in patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension or congenital heart disease?
Effect estimate: r = 0.98
p-value: p=<0.001
The study demonstrates the feasibility of quantifying total pulmonary arterial compliance using MR flow quantification combined with invasive pressure monitoring during MR-guided cardiac catheterization.
Supports feasibility of MR-invasive pulmonary arterial compliance assessment in suspected PH/CHD; leaves open its prognostic or therapeutic utility.
Pulmonary hypertensive disease is assessed by quantification of pulmonary vascular resistance. Pulmonary total arterial compliance is also an indicator of pulmonary hypertensive disease. However, because of difficulties in measuring compliance, it is rarely used. We describe a method of measuring pulmonary arterial compliance utilizing magnetic resonance (MR) flow data and invasive pressure measurements. Seventeen patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension or congenital heart disease requiring preoperative assessment underwent MR-guided cardiac catheterization. Invasive manometry was used to measure pulmonary arterial pressure, and phase-contrast MR was used to measure flow at baseline and at 20 ppm nitric oxide (NO). Total arterial compliance was calculated using the pulse pressure method (parameter optimization of the 2-element windkessel model) and the ratio of stroke volume to pulse pressure. There was good agreement between the two estimates of compliance (r = 0.98, P < 0.001). However, there was a systematic bias between the ratio of stroke volume to pulse pressure and the pulse pressure method (bias = 61%, upper level of agreement = 84%, lower level of agreement = 38%). In response to 20 ppm NO, there was a statistically significant fall in resistance, systolic pressure, and pulse pressure. In seven patients, total arterial compliance increased >10% in response to 20 ppm NO. As a population, the increase did not reach statistical significance. There was an inverse relation between compliance and resistance (r = 0.89, P < 0.001) and between compliance and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (r = 0.72, P < 0.001). We have demonstrated the feasibility of quantifying total arterial compliance using an MR method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muthurangu et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Suspected pulmonary hypertension or congenital heart disease (n=17). MR-guided cardiac catheterization with nitric oxide vs. Baseline was evaluated on Agreement between pulse pressure method and stroke volume to pulse pressure ratio for estimating total arterial compliance (r = 0.98, p=<0.001). Measuring total pulmonary arterial compliance using MR flow data and invasive pressure measurements is feasible, demonstrating good agreement between two estimation methods (r=0.98, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: