Key result
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire captures the health status of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation, with shortness of breath (n=20) and fatigue (n=19) being the most impactful.
Why the study?
The content validity of the KCCQ in patients with severe TR was unknown, including whether additional questions were needed to supplement it to validly quantify the benefit of different interventions.
Does the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) validly capture the disease-specific health status of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Observational (n=20)
Yes
Does the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) validly capture the disease-specific health status of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The KCCQ is a valid tool for capturing the disease-specific health status and symptom burden of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation.
BACKGROUND: Validly measuring disease-specific health status is critical in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) to quantify the benefit of different interventions. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) has been used to assess health status in patients with severe TR, but its content validity in this patient population is unknown, including whether additional questions are needed to supplement the KCCQ. METHODS: Twenty participants with symptomatic severe TR from 2 midwestern clinical sites were interviewed in 2023 using a semistructured guide. The interview guide addressed symptoms, physical and social functioning, and quality of life concepts of the KCCQ, as well as other potential TR symptoms not represented in the KCCQ. Interview transcripts were analyzed using inductive and deductive coding and content analysis, with additional participants recruited until thematic saturation occurred. RESULTS: Mean age of the participants was 80 (41-89), and 75% were female. Shortness of breath and fatigue were reported by virtually all participants (n=20 and n=19, respectively) and had a marked negative impact on their physical and social functioning and quality of life. Lower limb edema was also reported by 10 participants. Although these concepts are captured by the KCCQ, other symptoms were also reported, including appetite loss (n=8) and upper body edema (n=4), but did not seem to markedly affect participants' function or quality of life. In addition, all participants who experienced these other symptoms reported symptoms that were already captured by the KCCQ. CONCLUSIONS: All participants experienced symptoms captured by the KCCQ, and these symptoms had a substantial impact on their physical and social functioning and quality of life. Although some participants reported additional symptoms not assessed by the KCCQ, their incorporation would only marginally improve content validity. Thus, the current KCCQ appears to be appropriate for capturing the disease-specific health status of patients with severe TR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olds et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Severe tricuspid regurgitation (n=20). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) was evaluated on Content validity of the KCCQ. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire captures the health status of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation, with shortness of breath (n=20) and fatigue (n=19) being the most impactful.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: