Key result
Multi-domain intervention improves 18-month cognitive function scores, while ApoE4 carriage is linked to deterioration.
Why the study?
To examine how Cognitive Function Instrument scores change with ApoE4 carriage, objective cognitive decline, and dementia prevention intervention, and assess its usefulness in early dementia risk identification.
Does a multi-domain intervention improve subjective cognitive decline in older adults with normal cognition?
RCT (n=196)
randomized
Does a multi-domain intervention improve subjective cognitive decline in older adults with normal cognition?
CFI scores worsen over time in ApoE4 carriers but improve with a multi-domain intervention, suggesting CFI's utility in early dementia risk identification and monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports multi-domain intervention for subjective cognitive decline; extends CFI utility for early risk monitoring in ApoE4 carriers.
BackgroundSubjective cognitive decline represents an early stage of mild cognitive impairment, with the Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI) serving to subjectively evaluate the decline in daily living activities associated with this minor cognitive decline.ObjectiveTo examine how CFI scores change with apolipoprotein E ε4 (ApoE4) carriage, objective cognitive decline, and dementia prevention intervention. We aimed to assess CFI's usefulness in the early dementia risk identification.MethodsThis study involved 196 older adults with normal cognition in a randomized controlled intervention trial. CFI was assessed every six months from baseline to 18 months, using the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (ADCS-PACC) to measure cognitive decline. We employed a mixed model for repeated measures to compare the CFI scores at 18 months in the ApoE4, ADCS-PACC, and allocation groups.ResultsCFI scores increased in ApoE4 carriers and decreased in the intervention group, with significant differences observed in the CFI score changes at 18 months between carriers and non-carriers and among the allocation groups (p = 0.002, p = 0.026, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in the CFI score change among ADCS-PACC groups (p = 0101).ConclusionsWe observed CFI scores worsening over time in individuals with ApoE4 and showing a tendency to deteriorate over time in those with objective cognitive decline. These findings suggest that the CFI may be able to identify high-risk individuals for dementia at an early stage. Furthermore, the improvement in the CFI score is considered a significant finding when considering future measures for subjective cognitive decline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osaki et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Subjective cognitive decline (n=196). Multi-domain intervention vs. Control was evaluated on Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI) score changes at 18 months (p=0.026). Multi-domain intervention improved Cognitive Function Instrument scores at 18 months, while ApoE4 carriage was associated with score deterioration.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: