Key result
Chronic kidney disease was associated with worsening left ventricular ejection fraction (β -1.80; 95% CI -3.36 to -0.24) and greater dilation at 12 months compared to non-CKD in mild heart failure.
Why the study?
Does chronic kidney disease worsen left ventricular remodeling in patients with mild heart failure?
RCT
randomized
Does chronic kidney disease worsen left ventricular remodeling in patients with mild heart failure?
In patients with mild heart failure, chronic kidney disease is an independent risk factor for adverse ventricular remodeling and attenuates the structural benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CKD may warrant closer remodeling surveillance in mild HF; leaves open whether modification alters outcomes in prospective studies.
Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and heart failure. We evaluated the effect of CKD on left ventricular (LV) remodelling among patients with mild heart failure. Methods and results REVERSE was a randomized, controlled trial evaluating cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I/II heart failure. CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. We compared changes in LV function and size over the course of 12 months by CKD status using linear mixed models adjusted for demographics, co-morbidities, medications, cardiomyopathy aetiology, and CRT status. Finally, we evaluated the effect of CKD on cardiac remodelling among patients randomized to CRT on or off. CKD was associated with worsening LV function and dilation compared with the non-CKD group {adjusted, 12-month β coefficients for the CKD group compared with the non-CKD referent group: LV ejection fraction (%) [–1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) –3.36 to –0.24], LV end-systolic volume (mL) (14.16, 95% CI 3.96–24.36), LV end-diastolic volume (mL) (14.88, 95% CI 2.88–26.76), LV end-systolic diameter (cm) (0.36, 95% CI 0.12–0.48), LV end-diastolic diameter (cm) (0.24, 95% CI 0.012–0.36), mitral regurgitation (%) (3.12, 95% CI 0.48–5.76), and LV shape (0.036, 95% CI 0.012–0.060)}. In participants assigned to CRT, those without CKD had significantly greater improvements in LV structural parameters compared with the CKD group. Conclusions In comparison with participants with normal kidney function, CKD is an independent risk factor for ventricular dysfunction and dilation. CRT improves LV function and structure to a lesser extent in patients with CKD than in those with normal kidney function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathew et al. (2012) conducted an RCT in mild heart failure. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) vs. non-CKD (normal kidney function) was evaluated on change in left ventricular ejection fraction (%) (β -1.80, 95% CI -3.36 to -0.24). Chronic kidney disease was associated with worsening left ventricular ejection fraction (β -1.80; 95% CI -3.36 to -0.24) and greater dilation at 12 months compared to non-CKD in mild heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: