Key result
Cardiac resynchronization therapy significantly improved estimated GFR (mean difference 2.30 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference 6.24%) in patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease.
Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve renal function, cardiac function, and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients with chronic kidney disease?
Systematic Review
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve renal function, cardiac function, and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients with chronic kidney disease?
Mean Difference: 2.3 (95% CI 0.33–4.27)
Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves left ventricular and renal function in patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease.
Supports CRT consideration in eligible HF-CKD patients; extends prior evidence to concurrent renal and LVEF gains.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) confers morbidity and mortality benefits to selected patients with heart failure. This systematic review examined effects of CRT in CKD patients (estimated GFR [eGFR] <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: MEDLINE and Scopus (from 1990 to December 2012) and conference proceedings abstracts were searched for relevant observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies comparing the following outcomes were included: (1) CKD patients with and without CRT and (2) CKD patients with CRT to non-CKD patients with CRT. Mortality, eGFR, and left ventricular ejection fraction data were extracted and pooled when appropriate using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Eighteen studies (14 observational studies and 4 RCTs) were included. There was a modest improvement in eGFR with CRT among CKD patients (mean difference 2.30 ml/min per 1.73m(2); 95% confidence interval, 0.33 to 4.27). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection with CRT in CKD patients (mean difference 6.24%; 95% confidence interval, 3.46 to 9.07). Subgroup analysis of three RCTs reported lower rates of death or hospitalization for heart failure with CRT (versus other therapy) in the CKD population. Survival outcomes of CKD patients (compared with the non-CKD population) with CRT differed among observational studies and RCTs. CONCLUSIONS: CRT improves left ventricular and renal function in the CKD population with heart failure. Given the increasing use of cardiac devices, further studies examining the effects of CRT on mortality in CKD patients, particularly those with advanced kidney disease, are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garg et al. (2013) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure with chronic kidney disease. Cardiac resynchronization therapy vs. No CRT or non-CKD patients with CRT was evaluated on Change in estimated GFR (MD 2.30, 95% CI 0.33 to 4.27). Cardiac resynchronization therapy significantly improved estimated GFR (mean difference 2.30 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference 6.24%) in patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: