Key result
Tagging imaging demonstrated better detectability of myocardial fibrosis compared to conventional cine imaging, with an AUC of 0.98 versus 0.84 (p<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does tagging imaging on CMR improve the detectability of myocardial fibrosis compared to conventional cine imaging in patients with myocarditis and old myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=12)
Does tagging imaging on CMR improve the detectability of myocardial fibrosis compared to conventional cine imaging in patients with myocarditis and old myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.98% vs 0.84%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Supports tagging CMR for fibrosis detection in myocarditis and old MI; confirms RCT superiority over cine imaging.
Purpose: Myocardial fibrosis causes cardiac dysfunction, arrhythmias, and sudden death. Tagging imaging on cardiovascular MR can measure the intra-myocardial motion from the dynamic deformation of lines superimposed on the myocardium. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the detectability of myocardial fibrosis using tagging imaging and to compare this with conventional cine imaging. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 4 normal control (NML) subjects, 4 patients with myocarditis (MYO), and 4 patients with old myocardial infarction (ICM). We measured circumferential strain (Ecc) from tagging imaging, and regional wall thickening (rWT) from cine imaging. Fibrosis was determined from a late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) image. We evaluate diagnostic performance by comparing values of the area under curve (AUC) using ROC analysis. Results: Mean values of Ecc and rWT decreased in the area of LGE both in MYO and ICM patients. AUC values of Ecc and rWT in all subjects were 0.98 and 0.84, respectively (p < 0.0001). These values in MYO patients were 0.95 and 0.72 (p = 0.007), respectively, and 0.99 and 0.75, respectively, in ICM patients (p = 0.0008). Conclusions: Both Ecc and rWT decreased in the area with fibrosis in the patients with MYO and ICM. Tagging imaging showed better detectability of myocardial fibrosis than did cine imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kono et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Myocardial fibrosis (n=12). Tagging imaging (circumferential strain) vs. Conventional cine imaging (regional wall thickening) was evaluated on Detectability of myocardial fibrosis (Area under the curve) (p=<0.0001). Tagging imaging demonstrated better detectability of myocardial fibrosis compared to conventional cine imaging, with an AUC of 0.98 versus 0.84 (p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: