Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NK-92, a highly cytotoxic, interleukin-2 (IL-2)-dependent human natural killer (NK) cell line, has been of interest for basic and translational research. We report on a comprehensive analysis of NK-92 for factors implicated in NK cytotoxicity to elucidate factors underlying NK-92's high cytolytic activity and target range. Thus, we hope to develop a method to identify patients best suited to NK-92 immunotherapy. In addition, as a model system, we hope to increase understanding of the basis for the elevated activity exhibited by activated NK (ANK) cells. NK-92 exhibits an unusual receptor expression profile, expressing a relatively large number of activating (NKp30, NKp46, 2B4, NKGD, E, CD28) receptors. Conversely, it expresses few inhibitory receptors (NKGA/B, low levels of KIR2DL4, ILT-2), lacking most of the killer inhibitory receptors (KIRs) clonally expressed on normal NK cells. In addition, NK-92 expresses high levels of molecules involved in the perforin-granzyme cytolytic pathway as well as additional cytotoxic effector molecules including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-superfamily members FasL, TRAIL, TWEAK, TNF-alpha, indicating the ability to kill via alternative mechanisms. NK-92 also expresses other molecules implicated immune effector cell regulation (CD80, CD86, CD40L, TRANCE) whose relevance in NK killing is unclear. This study provides initial data to develop a method to identify NK-92 susceptible cells (cells expressing ligands for NK-92 activating receptors ie CD48 for 2B4 and CD80/86 for CD28). Furthermore, this work suggests mechanisms that may contribute to ANK cell activity, including modulation of receptor expression to favor activation, up-regulation of cytotoxic effector molecules, and acquisition of new cytolytic pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maki et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: