PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2018Circulation Heart Failure158 citationsOpen Access

Left Ventricular Mechanical Unloading by Total Support of Impella in Myocardial Infarction Reduces Infarct Size, Preserves Left Ventricular Function, and Prevents Subsequent Heart Failure in Dogs

View Full Paper
KSKeita SakuTKTakamori KakinoTATakahiro Arimura

Key Result

Left ventricular mechanical unloading by total support of Impella during acute myocardial infarction reduced infarct size compared to no support (2.1% vs 16.3%; P<0.001) in dogs.

Structured PICO

Does left ventricular mechanical unloading by Impella reduce infarct size and preserve LV function in dogs with myocardial infarction?

P
Population
20 dogs with left anterior descending coronary artery ligated for 180 minutes and then reperfused
I
Intervention
Impella support from 60 minutes after onset of ischemia to 60 minutes after reperfusion (partial support = 50% of total cardiac output; total support = systemic flow totally depends on Impella flow)
C
Comparator
Sham (no ischemia/reperfusion) and I/R (no Impella support)
O
Outcome
LV function and infarct size at 4 weeks after ischemia/reperfusionsurrogate

In a canine model of myocardial infarction, total mechanical unloading with Impella during the acute phase significantly reduced infarct size and preserved left ventricular function.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 2.1% vs 16.3%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

Background: Acute myocardial infarction remains a leading cause of chronic heart failure. Excessive myocardial oxygen demand relative to supply is the fundamental mechanism of myocardial infarction. We thus hypothesized that left ventricular (LV) mechanical unloading by the total support of transvascular LV assist device Impella could minimize oxygen demand, thereby reducing infarct size and preventing subsequent heart failure. Methods and Results: In 20 dogs, we ligated the left anterior descending coronary artery for 180 minutes and then reperfused. We introduced Impella from 60 minutes after the onset of ischemia to 60 minutes after reperfusion. In the partial support group, Impella supported 50% of total cardiac output. In the total support group, systemic flow totally depends on Impella flow. Four weeks after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R), we compared LV function and infarct size among 4 groups: sham (no I/R), I/R (no Impella support), partial support, and total support. Compared with I/R, total support lowered LV end-diastolic pressure (15.0±3.5 versus 4.7±1.7 mm Hg; P <0.001), increased LV end-systolic elastance (4.3±0.8 versus 13.9±5.1 mm Hg/mL; P <0.001), and decreased NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) level (4081±1123 versus 1773±390 pg/mL; P <0.05). Furthermore, total support markedly reduced infarct size relative to I/R, whereas partial support decreased infarct size to a lesser extent (I/R, 16.3±2.6; partial support, 8.5±4.3; and total support, 2.1±1.6%; P <0.001). Conclusions: LV mechanical unloading by the total support of Impella during the acute phase of myocardial infarction reduced infarct size and prevented subsequent heart failure in dogs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saku et al. (2018) studied Acute myocardial infarction (n=20). Impella vs. No Impella support (I/R) was evaluated on Infarct size (%) (p=<0.001). Left ventricular mechanical unloading by total support of Impella during acute myocardial infarction reduced infarct size compared to no support (2.1% vs 16.3%; P<0.001) in dogs.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1674fa0f5dd46f564c6d68https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.117.004397
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper