Key result
Simultaneous LV unloading and reperfusion fails to significantly reduce infarct size in preclinical model.
Why the study?
Despite advances in reperfusion times, mortality and morbidity remain high after acute myocardial infarction, and the optimal timing of left ventricular unloading is unclear.
Does simultaneous mechanical LV unloading and reperfusion reduce infarct size in an experimental swine model of acute myocardial infarction?
Does simultaneous mechanical LV unloading and reperfusion reduce infarct size in an experimental swine model of acute myocardial infarction?
p-value: p==0.19
In a swine model of acute myocardial infarction, simultaneous mechanical LV unloading and reperfusion reduced infarct size more than delayed reperfusion or no unloading.
Optimal LV unloading timing in AMI remains uncertain in humans; leaves open questions for randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Despite advances in reperfusion times, patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction carry an unacceptably high rate of mortality and morbidity. Mechanical unloading of the left ventricle (LV) has been suggested to reduce infarct size after acute myocardial infarction. Although prior studies have investigated LV unloading during ischemia with a delay in reperfusion, little is known about the optimal timing for LV unloading in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Studies were conducted in 17 adult Yorkshire swine weighing 67±5 kg. A coronary balloon was inflated in the mid left anterior descending for 60 minutes to induce a myocardial infarction. The coronary balloon was then deflated for 120 minutes (reperfusion). The animals were stratified into 3 groups: group 1 (control, reperfusion with no LV unloading, n=5), group 2 (LV unloading during ischemia with delayed reperfusion, n=6), and group 3 (simultaneous LV unloading and reperfusion, n=6). Staining the hearts with Evans blue and 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride was used to identify the area at risk and the infarct area respectively. Infarct percent size was defined as the area of infarcted myocardium divided by the area at risk. RESULTS: =0.19). CONCLUSIONS: In our large animal experimental model, simultaneous reperfusion and mechanical LV unloading yielded the smallest infarct size compared with no LV unloading or LV unloading with delayed reperfusion. In the context of prior studies showing benefit to unloading before reperfusion, these findings raise questions about how this strategy may be translated to humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ko et al. (2020) studied Acute myocardial infarction (n=17). Simultaneous mechanical LV unloading and reperfusion vs. No LV unloading or LV unloading with delayed reperfusion was evaluated on Infarct percent size (p==0.19). Simultaneous reperfusion and mechanical LV unloading yielded the smallest infarct size compared with no LV unloading or LV unloading with delayed reperfusion in an experimental swine model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: