Examines writing system classification and the Voynich Manuscript's unique characteristics, suggesting innovative metrics.
Paper 6 (Silva 2026) introduced BPE Mean Vocabulary Morpheme Length (VMML) as a writing system classifier and showed that the Voynich Manuscript occupies a discriminant zone (VMML = 5.918, 95% CI 5.77-6.05) above all 15 tested alphabetic natural languages. This paper (v2.0) expands to 55 corpora across 30+ languages and reports six extended analyses: (1) Alphabetic ceiling confirmed at 5.76; (2) Tagalog (VMML=5.914) is the sole natural-language entry into the Voynich CI, but BC=0.202 distinguishes it from Voynich (BC=0.361); (3) Romanization inflates VMML by 2.4-5.3 units (methodological confound). Extended analyses: (4) Currier A vs B: delta VMML=+1.27, delta CBMI=+0.16 bits -- two quantifiably distinct writing registers; (5) BC coherent across all 7 manuscript sections (CV=6.7%) -- single writing system confirmed; (6) 3D discriminant (VMML x BC x CBMI): Voynich isolated, nearest natural-language neighbor Irish at distance 0.17; (7) Six named hoax mechanisms (monoalphabetic, Vigenere/barbavara, Vigenere/Italian-Knowles 2026, null insertion, syllabic compression, vocabulary shuffle) each fail all three criteria simultaneously; (8) BC orthogonal to all classical textual metrics (|r| < 0.23 vs entropy, TTR, hapax, Zipf) -- genuinely new structural dimension. All code and six extension scripts publicly available in companion repository.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Felipe Ribeiro Da Silva (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: