Examines sub-lexical regularity in the Voynich Manuscript, indicating unique morphological structure.
The Voynich Manuscript (Beinecke MS 408, c. 1404-1438 CE) resists classification because standard statistical metrics are reproduced by both natural language and human-produced gibberish (Gaskell & Bowern 2022). We introduce Byte-Pair Encoding mean vocabulary morpheme length (BPE VMML) as a writing system classifier and apply it to 21 corpora spanning gibberish, 15 alphabetic languages, two cipher controls, and two logographic references. Three clusters emerge: gibberish (range 2.0-4.1), alphabetic natural and constructed language (4.06-5.25), and high sub-word regularity (5.62-5.92, containing Chinese Pinyin and Voynich). The Voynich VMML of 5.918 (95% CI 5.77-6.05) lies entirely above the alphabetic cluster maximum (4.51), with no overlap. Five mechanistic hypotheses are tested. The central finding is a systematic suffix inventory analysis: 37 distinct 3-character endings account for 80% of the entire Voynich corpus (vs. 172 for Latin, 109 for German). BPE applied to the last four characters of Voynich tokens alone yields VMML=5.868, matching the full-corpus value and exceeding Latin and German full-corpus values. The suffix inventory is stable across scribal sections (Currier A and B share a core of 9 dominant endings). The rank ordering Gibberish < Alphabetic < Voynich >= Pinyin is preserved across all nine BPE parameter configurations tested. All code and data are publicly available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Felipe J. F. da Silva (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: