Randomized trial investigates boundary layer stability in supersonic fins, suggesting new insights into wing design.
This paper investigates the stability of the boundary layer over a finite-span 65 deg swept wing at Mach 2 and a unit Reynolds number [Formula: see text] with one- and two-dimensional stability analyses. Three branches of instabilities are identified: Tollmien–Schlichting (T–S) modes, crossflow ([Formula: see text]) modes, and connected modes. The connected modes are embedded within the Tollmien–Schlichting and crossflow branches. The T–S modes lie in the vicinity of the leading edge or attachment line ([Formula: see text]) with frequencies larger than [Formula: see text]. The [Formula: see text] modes peak at a significantly large distance away from the leading edge with the most unstable frequency around [Formula: see text] and much smaller growth rates than the T–S modes. The [Formula: see text] connected modes have two amplitude peaks in the attachment line as well as at a position slightly away from the attachment line and exhibit very high frequencies beyond [Formula: see text]. The [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] connected modes have an additional amplitude peak in the vicinity of the attachment line. The growth rates of [Formula: see text] connected modes are comparable with the T–S modes, whereas the [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] modes are significantly less unstable than the [Formula: see text] modes. This study enriches the physical mechanisms and instabilities involved in supersonic swept wings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: