Key result
Travel time >2 hours to PCI centers linked to ~78% lower odds of timely STEMI reperfusion.
Why the study?
Determinants of timely reperfusion within recommended time limits for STEMI patients, including geography, patient characteristics, and socio-economy, were not well established.
Cohort (n=7,607)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Geographic inequities limit timely STEMI reperfusion in Norway; hypothesis-generating for pharmacoinvasive strategies in remote areas.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate determinants of reperfusion within recommended time limits (timely reperfusion) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients, exploring the impact of geography, patient characteristics and socio-economy. DESIGN: National register-based cohort study. SETTING: Multilevel logistic regression models were applied to examine the associations between timely reperfusion and residency in hospital referral areas and municipalities, patient characteristics, and socio-economy. PARTICIPANTS: 7607 Norwegian ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients registered in the Norwegian Registry of Myocardial Infarction during 2015-2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The odds of timely reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or fibrinolysis. RESULTS: Among 7607 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients in Norway, 56% received timely reperfusion. The Norwegian goal is 85%. While 81% of the patients living in the Oslo hospital referral area received timely reperfusion, only 13% of the patients living in Finnmark did so.Patients aged 75-84 years had lower odds of timely reperfusion than patients below 55 years of age (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.87). Patients with moderate or high comorbidity had lower odds than patients without (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.95 and OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.84). More than 2 hours from symptom onset to first medical contact gave lower odds than less than 30 min (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.72). 1-2 hours of travel time to a PCI centre (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.49) and more than 2 hours (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.30) gave substantially lower odds than less than 1 hour of travel time. CONCLUSIONS: The varying proportion of patients receiving timely reperfusion across hospital referral areas implies inequity in fundamental healthcare services, not compatible with established Norwegian health policy. The importance of travel time to PCI centre points at the expanded use of prehospital pharmacoinvasive strategy to obtain the goals of timely reperfusion in Norway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uleberg et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n=7,607). Factors associated with timely reperfusion was evaluated on Timely reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or fibrinolysis. Only 56% of Norwegian STEMI patients received timely reperfusion, with travel time >2 hours to a PCI center substantially lowering the odds compared to <1 hour.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: