Key result
Holter ECG analysis of cyclic heart rate variation reliably correlates with polysomnography for Cheyne-Stokes screening.
Why the study?
Cheyne-Stokes respiration is linked to mortality in heart failure, but access to diagnostic polysomnography may be limited, whereas Holter-detected cyclic variation of heart rate is easier to perform.
Does cyclic variation of heart rate analysis via Holter ECG reliably screen for Cheyne-Stokes respiration compared to polysomnography in patients with heart failure?
Observational (n=41)
Does cyclic variation of heart rate analysis via Holter ECG reliably screen for Cheyne-Stokes respiration compared to polysomnography in patients with heart failure?
Effect estimate: Intraclass correlation coefficient 0.74 (95% CI 0.56-0.85)
p-value: p=<0.001
Cyclic variation of heart rate detected by Holter ECG offers a reliable and better-tolerated screening method for Cheyne-Stokes respiration in patients with heart failure compared to full polysomnography.
Holter CVHR shows moderate CSR reliability in heart failure; leaves open prospective validation before screening use.
BACKGROUND: Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) is a major form of central sleep apnea in patients with heart failure and is associated with mortality in these patients. Although full polysomnography is required for CSR diagnosis, access may be limited. Cyclic variation of heart rate (CVHR) detected by Holter electrocardiogram reflects changes in cardiac autonomic activity associated with apnea-hypopnea events and is easier to perform than polysomnography. METHODS: We examined whether RR interval shortening time in the CVHR analysis could be useful for screening CSR. In this study, 41 patients were analyzed. Holter electrocardiogram and polysomnography were simultaneously performed. CVHR events were classified as CSR or not based on RR interval shortening time, and the percentage of CSR (%CSR), defined as the ratio of total CSR duration to time in bed, was measured. RESULTS: There were 27 patients with heart failure. The patients tended to have severe sleep-disordered breathing and an apnea-hypopnea index of 38.9 (24.7), and seven patients had predominantly central events. Based on %CSR determined by polysomnography with manual scoring ≧20%, 10 patients were labeled as CSR-positive and 31 as CSR-negative. There was moderate-to-good reliability between the percentage of CSR determined via CVHR analysis and the percentage of CSR determined via polysomnography [intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.74 (0.56, 0.85); p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Holter electrocardiograms are performed for many patients with heart failure and are better tolerated than overnight polysomnography. Our method of using CVHR detected by Holter electrocardiogram could be helpful for CSR screening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Kobayashi et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cheyne-Stokes respiration (n=41). Cyclic variation in heart rate (CVHR) analysis via Holter electrocardiogram vs. Polysomnography was evaluated on Reliability between the percentage of CSR determined via CVHR analysis and polysomnography (Intraclass correlation coefficient 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.85, p=<0.001). Holter electrocardiogram analysis of cyclic variation in heart rate reliably correlated with polysomnography for Cheyne-Stokes respiration screening (ICC 0.74; 95% CI 0.56-0.85; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: