Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper treats the market for special-interest campaign contributions and political "favors" as a simple asset market. The model yields a simple equilibrium relationship among three variables: the total amount of investor contributions a candidate receives, the monetary value of the favors he has promised, and his probability of winning. Using data on open-seat races for the U.S. House of Representatives, the author confronts the model with a series of tests. Despite the starkness of the model, the results of these tests are highly supportive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James M. Snyder (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: