Key result
Adjusted temporal activation in CRT is linked to a ~48% response rate and improved LV mechanics.
Why the study?
CRT improves left ventricular function in heart failure, but the underlying mechanisms are not completely explained.
Does echocardiography-guided temporal activation optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy improve left ventricular end-systolic volume in patients with heart failure and LBBB?
Observational (n=46)
Open-label
No
Does echocardiography-guided temporal activation optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy improve left ventricular end-systolic volume in patients with heart failure and LBBB?
Echocardiography-guided optimization of CRT temporal activation improves left ventricular rotational mechanics and stroke volume, which predicts favorable reverse remodeling in heart failure patients.
Supports hypothesis generation for echocardiography-guided CRT optimization; should not change practice without randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has an additive therapeutic influence on left ventricular function in heart failure patients, but the underlying mechanisms through which it works are not completely explained. Our aim was to further elucidate the role of this intervention via rotational mechanics using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). RESULTS: We investigated 46 patients (65 ± 9 years) who received CRT. All enrolled patients were assessed on admission by 2D-STE and 6 min walk test (6 min WT) and followed in the outpatient device clinic by 2D-STE (at 1 week and 6 months post-implantation) and 6 min WT (at 6 months post-implantation). On their first appointment all biventricular systems were optimised by atrioventricular delay optimisation and by changing the temporal activation of ventricular electrodes aiming to reach the highest left ventricular effective stroke volume across all activation options. A new 2D-STE based index (twist integral) targeting to assess the rotational mechanics of the whole cardiac cycle was also measured to further explain the CRT response. Twenty-two (48%) patients were responders at 6-month follow-up and most of them had dilated cardiomyopathy. The commonest selected mode that was related with the greatest left ventricular performance response was the simultaneous activation of the 2 ventricular leads (39%). The strongest predictor of CRT response was the improvement of effective stroke volume between admission and first appointment at clinic, followed by the improvement of twist integral, the absence of coronary artery disease, and the improvement of peak systolic twist. CONCLUSIONS: Additional CRT optimisation via changing the temporal activation of ventricular electrodes is beneficial for left ventricular performance in heart failure patients. The success of biventricular pacing may also be explained by the improvement of left ventricular rotational mechanics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefanidis et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=46). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) optimisation vs. Non-responders was evaluated on Response to CRT (≥15% improvement in LV end-systolic volume). Cardiac resynchronization therapy optimisation via adjusted temporal activation of ventricular electrodes resulted in a 48% response rate at 6 months, associated with improved left ventricular rotational mechanics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: