Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan cuts MACCE ~53% vs ACEI or ARB in AMI after revascularization.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the effects and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce MACCEs and acute heart failure in patients with acute myocardial infarction after revascularization compared to ACEI or ARB?
Meta-Analysis (n=586)
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce MACCEs and acute heart failure in patients with acute myocardial infarction after revascularization compared to ACEI or ARB?
Effect estimate: OR 0.47 (95% CI 0.30-0.73)
p-value: p=0.0007
In patients with acute myocardial infarction after revascularization, sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduces major adverse cardiovascular events and acute heart failure compared to ACEI/ARB therapy.
Supports sacubitril/valsartan over ACEI/ARB to reduce MACCEs after AMI revascularization; extends Level 1 meta-analytic evidence.
To evaluate the effects and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), a total of four databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science, and the ClinicalTrials.gov website were searched. Using a combination of medical subject headings and entry terms, the final search was performed in July 2021. A manual search of cross-references from the original articles was also conducted. The meta-analysis was subsequently performed with Revman 5.3 software and a total of four studies comprising 586 patients were included. The results disclosed a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) [odds ratio (OR), 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30-0.73; P=0.0007], readmission (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.29-0.71; P=0.0006), incidence of acute heart failure (AHF) (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.71; P=0.0007) and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide [standardized mean difference (SMD), -0.88; 95% CI, -1.55-(-0.21); P=0.01] in the sacubitril/valsartan group compared with that in the control group, and a random effects model was used to pool these data. No significant differences were identified in the incidence of hypotension (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 0.55-15.51; P=0.21), adverse events (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 0.42-11.37; P=0.35), left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference, 1.96; 95% CI, -0.84-4.76; P=0.17) or soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 (SMD, -0.45; 95% CI, -1.62-0.71; P=0.45) according to the random effects model. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis revealed that sacubitril/valsartan was able to effectively reduce the incidence of MACCEs, readmission and AHF in patients with AMI after revascularization without any obvious adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=586). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. ACEI or ARB (perindopril, enalapril, ramipril, valsartan) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.73, p=0.0007). Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (OR 0.47) compared to ACEI or ARB in patients with acute myocardial infarction after revascularization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: