Key result
Trial compares behavioral activation versus antidepressants for reducing depressive symptoms in advanced HF.
Why the study?
Heart failure affects millions with nearly 50% experiencing depressive symptoms, but comparative evidence on evidence-based treatment options in advanced heart failure is lacking.
Does Behavioral Activation psychotherapy compared to Antidepressant Medication Management improve depressive symptom severity in adults with advanced heart failure and depression?
RCT (n=416)
Open-label
1:1 block randomization
No
Does Behavioral Activation psychotherapy compared to Antidepressant Medication Management improve depressive symptom severity in adults with advanced heart failure and depression?
This study protocol describes a pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing behavioral activation psychotherapy to collaborative care antidepressant medication management for treating depression in patients with advanced heart failure.
OBJECTIVES: Heart Failure is a chronic syndrome affecting over 5.7 million in the US and 26 million adults worldwide with nearly 50% experiencing depressive symptoms. The objective of the study is to compare the effects of two evidence-based treatment options for adult patients with depression and advanced heart failure, on depressive symptom severity, physical and mental health related quality of life (HRQoL), heart-failure specific quality of life, caregiver burden, morbidity, and mortality at 3, 6 and 12-months. METHODS: Trial design. Pragmatic, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial. Interventions. The treatment interventions are: (1) Behavioral Activation (BA), a patient-centered psychotherapy which emphasizes engagement in enjoyable and valued personalized activities as selected by the patient; or (2) Antidepressant Medication Management administered using the collaborative care model (MEDS). Participants. Adults aged 18 and over with advanced heart failure (defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II, III, and IV) and depression (defined as a score of 10 or above on the PHQ-9 and confirmed by the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview for the DSM-5) selected from all patients at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center who are admitted with heart failure and all patients presenting to the outpatient programs of the Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. We plan to randomize 416 patients to BA or MEDS, with an estimated 28% loss to follow-up/inability to collect follow-up data. Thus, we plan to include 150 in each group for a total of 300 participants from which data after randomization will be collected and analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: The current trial is the first to compare the impact of BA and MEDS on depressive symptoms, quality of life, caregiver burden, morbidity, and mortality in patients with depression and advanced heart failure. The trial will provide novel results that will be disseminated and implemented into a wide range of current practice settings. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT03688100.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
IsHak et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Advanced heart failure and depression (n=416). Behavioral Activation (BA) vs. Antidepressant Medication Management (MEDS) was evaluated on Change in depressive symptom severity at 6 months from baseline as measured by the PHQ-9. Behavioral Activation and Antidepressant Medication Management will be compared for their effectiveness in reducing depressive symptoms among patients with advanced heart failure in this pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: