Key result
Cognitive behavior therapy reduced depression scores compared to usual care in heart failure patients at 16 weeks.
Why the study?
Major depression and inadequate self-care are common in heart failure, but little is known about how to intervene when both problems coexist.
Does cognitive behavior therapy followed by a tailored HF self-care intervention improve depression and self-care in patients with heart failure and major depression?
RCT (n=139)
Single-blind
Randomized
No
Does cognitive behavior therapy followed by a tailored HF self-care intervention improve depression and self-care in patients with heart failure and major depression?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cognitive behavior therapy effectively treats major depression in heart failure patients, but initiating it prior to a tailored self-care intervention does not provide additional benefit for heart failure self-care.
Background: Major depression and inadequate self-care are common in patients with heart failure (HF). Little is known about how to intervene when both problems are present. This study examined the efficacy of a sequential approach to treating these problems. Methods: Stepped Care for Depression in HF was a single-site, single-blind, randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) versus usual care (UC) for major depression in patients with HF. The intensive phase of the CBT intervention lasted between 8 and 16 weeks, depending upon the rate of improvement in depression. All participants received a tailored HF self-care intervention that began 8 weeks after randomization. The intensive phase of the self-care intervention ended at 16 weeks post-randomization. The coprimary outcome measures were the Beck Depression Inventory (version 2) and the Maintenance scale of the Self-Care of HF Index (v6.2) at week 16. Results: One hundred thirty-nine patients with HF and major depression were enrolled; 70 were randomized to UC and 69 to CBT. At week 16, the patients in the CBT arm scored 4.0 points ([95% CI, −7.3 to −0.8]; P =0.02) lower on the Beck Depression Inventory, version 2 than those in the usual care arm. Mean scores on the Self-Care of HF Index Maintenance scale were not significantly different between the groups ([95% CI, −6.5 to 1.5]; P =0.22). Conclusions: CBT is more effective than usual care for major depression in patients with HF. However, initiating CBT before starting a tailored HF self-care intervention does not increase the benefit of the self-care intervention. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02997865.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freedland et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Heart failure and major depression (n=139). Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) vs. Usual care (UC) was evaluated on Beck Depression Inventory (version 2) and the Maintenance scale of the Self-Care of HF Index (v6.2) at week 16 (MD -4.0, 95% CI -7.3 to -0.8, p=0.02). Cognitive behavior therapy reduced depression scores compared to usual care in heart failure patients at 16 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: