Key result
Murine coronary simulations reveal ~10-fold higher wall shear stress and reduced helical flow versus humans.
Why the study?
Despite the critical role of coronary morphology and hemodynamics in coronary artery disease development, comprehensive analyses of these factors in murine models are limited.
Significant inter-species differences exist in coronary blood flow and geometry between mice and humans, emphasizing the need for species-specific calibration in predictive models of CAD.
Inter-species differences caution against direct murine CFD translation to humans; leaves open validity of mouse models for CAD prediction.
Despite the critical role of coronary morphology and hemodynamics in the development of coronary artery disease (CAD), comprehensive analyses of these factors in murine models are limited. Our study integrates in vivo approaches with computational methods to yield a complete set of precise and reliable morphologic and hemodynamic measurements and to investigate their interrelationship in the left coronary artery of healthy C57BL/6 mice. The work utilizes advanced micro-computed tomography imaging, enhanced with Microfil® coronary perfusion, complemented by morphometric analysis and computational fluid dynamic simulation. Our results in murine coronary arteries show: i) bifurcations are the most geometrically complex regions, susceptible to disturbed hemodynamics and, consequently, endothelial dysfunction; ii) vascular endothelial cells experience wall shear stress (WSS) an order of magnitude greater than in humans, primarily due to their smaller size, although minimal WSS multi-directionality is noted in both species; iii) intravascular flow exhibits reduced helical patterns compared to human coronaries, indicating a need for further investigation into their potential protective role against disease onset; and iv) strong correlations between geometric and hemodynamic indices highlight the need to integrate these factors for a comprehensive understanding of CAD initiation and progression in preclinical models. Thus, to optimize research based on murine models, it is essential not only to move beyond idealized geometries, but also to avoid uncritically relying on hemodynamic measurements from different species. This study grounds future development of mouse-specific predictive models of CAD, a critical step toward advancing translational research to understand and prevent CAD in humans. • Augmented imaging techniques and computational infrastructures are complementary. • This combination enables comprehensive morphological-hemodynamic analysis in mice. • Geometric profiling could serve as an early biomarker for vascular pathology. • Significant inter-species differences exist in coronary blood flow and geometry. • Findings emphasize the need for species-specific calibration in predictive models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serafini et al. (2025) studied Coronary artery disease (preclinical model). Micro-computed tomography and computational fluid dynamic simulation vs. Human coronary hemodynamics (reference) was evaluated on Morphologic and hemodynamic measurements (wall shear stress, helical patterns). Computational fluid dynamic simulations in murine coronary arteries demonstrated wall shear stress an order of magnitude greater than in humans and reduced helical flow patterns.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: