Key result
Using average flow fractions for CFD simulations in the mouse aorta yields results comparable to measured waveforms, whereas Murray's law significantly alters the outcomes.
This study provides a reference dataset for time-dependent volumetric flow waveforms in the mouse aorta and demonstrates that modifying Murray's law exponent from 3 to 2 improves CFD simulation accuracy when mouse-specific boundary conditions are unavailable.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Refines CFD boundary conditions for murine aorta; extends reference datasets while leaving clinical translation open.
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations allow for calculation of a detailed flow field in the mouse aorta and can thus be used to investigate a potential link between local hemodynamics and disease development. To perform these simulations in a murine setting, one often needs to make assumptions (e.g. when mouse-specific boundary conditions are not available), but many of these assumptions have not been validated due to a lack of reference data. In this study, we present such a reference data set by combining high-frequency ultrasound and contrast-enhanced micro-CT to measure (in vivo) the time-dependent volumetric flow waveforms in the complete aorta (including seven major side branches) of 10 male ApoE -/- deficient mice on a C57Bl/6 background. In order to assess the influence of some assumptions that are commonly applied in literature, four different CFD simulations were set up for each animal: (i) imposing the measured volumetric flow waveforms, (ii) imposing the average flow fractions over all 10 animals, presented as a reference data set, (iii) imposing flow fractions calculated by Murray's law, and (iv) restricting the geometrical model to the abdominal aorta (imposing measured flows). We found that - even if there is sometimes significant variation in the flow fractions going to a particular branch - the influence of using average flow fractions on the CFD simulations is limited and often restricted to the side branches. On the other hand, Murray's law underestimates the fraction going to the brachiocephalic trunk and strongly overestimates the fraction going to the distal aorta, influencing the outcome of the CFD results significantly. Changing the exponential factor in Murray's law equation from 3 to 2 (as suggested by several authors in literature) yields results that correspond much better to those obtained imposing the average flow fractions. Restricting the geometrical model to the abdominal aorta did not influence the outcome of the CFD simulations. In conclusion, the presented reference dataset can be used to impose boundary conditions in the mouse aorta in future studies, keeping in mind that they represent a subsample of the total population, i.e., relatively old, non-diseased, male C57Bl/6 ApoE -/- mice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trachet et al. (2011) studied this question. Different boundary condition assumptions (average flow fractions, Murray's law) vs. Measured volumetric flow waveforms was evaluated on CFD simulation outcomes (flow fractions). Using average flow fractions for CFD simulations in the mouse aorta yields results comparable to measured waveforms, whereas Murray's law significantly alters the outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: