Why the study?
Clinical evidence supporting the use of complementary and alternative medicines in heart failure remains limited and controversial, and their use is rarely documented by healthcare professionals.
What are the efficacy, safety, adverse effects, and drug interactions of complementary and alternative medicines in patients with heart failure?
What are the efficacy, safety, adverse effects, and drug interactions of complementary and alternative medicines in patients with heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This AHA scientific statement highlights the limited evidence for CAM in heart failure and emphasizes the need for clinicians to inquire about CAM use due to potential adverse effects and drug interactions.
Complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) are commonly used across the world by diverse populations and ethnicities but remain largely unregulated. Although many CAM agents are purported to be efficacious and safe by the public, clinical evidence supporting the use of CAM in heart failure remains limited and controversial. Furthermore, health care professionals rarely inquire or document use of CAM as part of the medical record, and patients infrequently disclose their use without further prompting. The goal of this scientific statement is to summarize published efficacy and safety data for CAM and adjunctive interventional wellness approaches in heart failure. Furthermore, other important considerations such as adverse effects and drug interactions that could influence the safety of patients with heart failure are reviewed and discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chow et al. (2022) conducted a review in Heart failure. Complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) was evaluated. Clinical evidence supporting the use of complementary and alternative medicines in heart failure remains limited and controversial, necessitating careful consideration of adverse effects and drug interactions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: