Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many educators have had to rethink their methodology for summative assessment. Are timed and proctored exams appropriate---or even feasible---in this new open-internet, online learning environment? In this experience paper, we discuss our unique exams framework: our tool for generating exams that are uniquely identifiable but conceptually identical. In our university-level Probability for Computer Scientists Course, students completed unique exams generated from a common exam skeleton, with unique numeric variations per problem. With few deviations from the creation, administration, and grading processes of a traditional exam, our framework can provide a layer of security for both students and instructors about exam reliability for any classroom environment---in-person or online. In addition to sharing our experience designing unique exams, in this paper we also present a simple end-to-end tool and example question templates for different CS subjects that other instructors can adapt to their own courses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rusak et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: