Key result
Epicardial leads show greater RF heating than endocardial leads in pediatric MRI phantoms, reaching 12°C.
Why the study?
Epicardial CIEDs are primarily used in young children but lack FDA MR conditional approval due to limited data, leading pediatric hospitals to either refuse MRI scans or apply adult-derived scan-all strategies.
Does radiofrequency exposure at 1.5 T increase temperature rise in epicardial compared to endocardial device configurations in adult and pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms?
Does radiofrequency exposure at 1.5 T increase temperature rise in epicardial compared to endocardial device configurations in adult and pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms?
Epicardial CIED leads in pediatric patients pose a significantly higher risk of RF-induced heating during 1.5 T MRI compared to endocardial leads or adult patients, highlighting the need for individualized risk-benefit assessments.
May warrant caution with epicardial leads in pediatric 1.5 T MRI; leaves open in vivo translation.
This study focused on the potential risks of radiofrequency-induced heating of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in children and adults with epicardial and endocardial leads of varying lengths during cardiothoracic MRI scans. Infants and young children are the primary recipients of epicardial CIEDs, though the devices have not been approved as MR conditional by the FDA due to limited data, leading to pediatric hospitals either refusing the MRI service to most pediatric CIED patients or adopting a scan-all strategy based on results from adult studies. The study argues that risk-benefit decisions should be made on an individual basis. We used 120 clinically relevant epicardial and endocardial device configurations in adult and pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms to determine the temperature rise during RF exposure at 1.5 T. The results showed that there was significantly higher RF heating of epicardial leads than endocardial leads in the pediatric phantom, but not in the adult phantom. Additionally, body size and lead length significantly affected RF heating, with RF heating up to 12 °C observed in models based on younger children with short epicardial leads. The study provides evidence-based knowledge on RF-induced heating of CIEDs and highlights the importance of making individual risk-benefit decisions when assessing the potential risks of MRI scans in pediatric CIED patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2023) studied Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) (n=120). 1.5 T MRI RF exposure vs. Epicardial vs endocardial leads was evaluated on Temperature rise during RF exposure. RF heating during 1.5 T MRI was significantly higher for epicardial leads than endocardial leads in pediatric phantoms, with temperature rises up to 12 °C in models of younger children.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: