Key result
Deep learning models accurately predict maximum SAR at cardiac lead tips during MRI.
Why the study?
Predicting MRI-induced RF heating of CIED leads is essential for patient safety, but traditional phantom experiments and electromagnetic simulations are time-consuming.
Can deep learning algorithms accurately predict RF heating (Max1gSAR) of cardiac leads during MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T based on lead trajectory?
Can deep learning algorithms accurately predict RF heating (Max1gSAR) of cardiac leads during MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T based on lead trajectory?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Deep learning algorithms can rapidly and accurately predict MRI-induced radiofrequency heating of cardiac leads based solely on lead geometry and MRI coil features.
Purpose : Predicting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-induced heating of elongated conductive implants such as leads in cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is essential to assessing patient safety. Phantom experiments and electromagnetic simulations have been traditionally used to estimate radiofrequency (RF) heating of implants, but they are notably time-consuming. Recently, machine learning has shown promise for fast prediction of RF heating of orthopedic implants, when the position of the implant within the MRI RF coil was predetermined. Here we explored whether deep learning could be applied to predict RF heating of conductive leads with variable positions/orientations during MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T. Methods : Models of 600 cardiac leads with clinically relevant trajectories were generated and electromagnetic simulations were performed to calculate the maximum of 1g-averaged SAR at the tips of lead models during MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T. Deep learning algorithms were trained to predict the maximum SAR at the lead’s tip from the knowledge of coordinates of points along the lead’s trajectory. Results : Despite the large range of SAR values (~200 W/kg-~3300 W/kg), the RMSE of predicted vs ground truth SAR remained at 223W/kg and 206 W/kg, with the R 2 scores of 0.89 and 0.85 on the testing set for 1.5 T and 3 T models, respectively. Conclusion : Machine learning shows promise for fast assessment of RF heating of lead-like implants with only the knowledge of the lead’s geometry and MRI RF coil features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2021) studied Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) undergoing MRI (n=600). Deep learning algorithm vs. Electromagnetic simulations (ground truth) was evaluated on Maximum 1g-averaged SAR (Max1gSAR) at the lead's tip (R^2 0.89 (1.5 T) and 0.85 (3 T)). Deep learning algorithms predicted the maximum 1g-averaged SAR at the tips of cardiac leads during MRI with RMSE of 223 W/kg and 206 W/kg, and R^2 scores of 0.89 and 0.85 for 1.5 T and 3 T models.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: