Why the study?
Does MRI at 1.5T and 3T cause significant heating around retained cardiac leads?
Does MRI at 1.5T and 3T cause significant heating around retained cardiac leads?
Simulations suggest MRI can be performed safely using a local head coil at 1.5T and 3T, and with a body coil at 1.5T under specific SAR limits in patients with retained cardiac leads.
Variable SAR by coil and landmark warrants caution in MRI planning for retained leads; leaves open prospective safety validation.
Purpose To evaluate the local specific absorption rate (SAR) and heating around retained cardiac leads during MRI at 64 MHz (1.5T) and 127 MHz (3T) as a function of RF coil type and imaging landmark. Methods Numerical models of retained cardiac leads were built from CT and X‐ray images of 6 patients with retained cardiac leads. Electromagnetic simulations and bio‐heat modeling were performed with MRI RF body and head coils tuned to 64 MHz and 127 MHz and positioned at 9 different imaging landmarks covering an area from the head to the lower limbs. Results For all patients and at both 1.5T and 3T, local transmit head coils produced negligible temperature rise ( ) for . For body imaging with quadrature‐driven coils at 1.5T, during a 10‐min scan remained < 3°C at all imaging landmarks for and <6°C for . For body imaging at 3T, during a 10‐min scan remained < 6°C at all imaging landmarks for . For shorter pulse sequences up to 2 min, remained < 6°C for . Conclusion For the models based on 6 patients studied, simulations suggest that MRI could be performed safely using a local head coil at both 1.5T and 3T, and with a body coil at 1.5T with pulses that produced . MRI at 3T could be performed safely in these patients using pulses with .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golestanirad et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: