Key result
This review discusses the technological concerns and potential solutions for MRI-induced lead heating in patients with implanted medical devices such as pacemakers and neurostimulators.
Why the study?
Can pacemakers, neurostimulators, leads, or guide wires be made inherently safe under worst-case MRI conditions?
Can pacemakers, neurostimulators, leads, or guide wires be made inherently safe under worst-case MRI conditions?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights the technological concerns of MRI-induced lead heating in patients with implanted devices and discusses potential design resolutions for MRI safety.
The substantial benefits of magnetic resonance imaging are often denied to patients known to have implanted medical devices such as pacemakers and neurostimulators. Other patients are put at potential risk when they undergo an MRI procedure, even though specific informed consent is required regarding the possible MRI interactions with the implanted device. The medical community is currently divided over the actual extent of the MRI safety problem. In this report, insight is provided into the wide array of results achieved by many researchers; also, several options for producing medical devices that are inherently safe under worst-case MRI conditions are presented. As the problem is very complex and the variety of implants is large, this paper focuses on the problems of MRI-induced lead heating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Helfer et al. (2006) conducted a review in Patients with implanted medical devices undergoing MRI. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated. This review discusses the technological concerns and potential solutions for MRI-induced lead heating in patients with implanted medical devices such as pacemakers and neurostimulators.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: