Key result
LBBAP lead failure occurs 20 months post-implantation due to friction with a defibrillator lead.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Highlights a potential complication of lead-to-lead interaction causing left bundle branch area pacing lead failure.
Raises awareness of lead interaction risk with combined LBBAP-defibrillator implants; hypothesis-generating case report leaves incidence and prevention open.
Atrioventricular (AV) node ablation and conduction system pacing using left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an excellent option for patients with atrial fibrillation and rapid ventricular rates refractory to medical therapy.1,2 Patients with severely reduced left ventricular systolic function benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for prevention of sudden cardiac death.3 Biventricular pacing using coronary vein lead has been shown to reduce heart failure hospitalization and mortality compared to right ventricular pacing in patients undergoing AV node ablation,4 but may be limited by anatomical challenges, nonphysiologic biventricular activation, phrenic nerve stimulation, and/or high pacing thresholds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahajan et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Left bundle branch area pacing lead failure (n=1). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) was evaluated. A 68-year-old man experienced left bundle branch area pacing lead failure 20 months post-implantation due to interaction and friction with a defibrillator lead near the septal insertion site.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: